Stupid people on my internets
There was this article in the NYT today about plagiarism and when I emailed it to my friend I wrote the following message:
I don’t get people who are like “um i didnt no u had 2 site sumthing sum1 else had wrote lol im gonna twitter abt my punishment heering LOL”
Really I don’t get those people, their stupidity and failure to communicate is something I just cannot understand; not because I’m too stupid, but because the laziness with which those people engage the English language is staggering.
I’m not sure those people are new, and I’m not sure it’s correct to suggest that the current destruction of proper English is a symptom of a generation that is really any different than those in the past. Honestly, I imagine that today’s tween is producing an exponentially greater amount of text than those even a decade or two ago. I know that I write more now than I did even 10 years ago because I spend so much more time engaging in a medium that is text-based rather than speech based.
If I had a time machine, I’m sure I could go back to the 1950’s and find a similarly fail-imbricated youth that had a tenuous grasp on the correct usage of English. Certainly this pathological stupidity would manifest itself in fundamentally different ways; of course I’m not suggesting that the conditions which define the textual artifacts of today’s idiot-children are the same as previous generations, far from it in fact.
Yeah I think people are stupid today, but the stupidity of their writing is more visible than at any other time in history. I bet if you caught Queen of Internet LOLing at your local Taco Bell and had a conversation with her, it would be in relatively coherent spoken English where the spoken “you” versus “u” is indistinguishable. There have always been stupid, intellectually lazy people out there; but now it’s more likely that we’ll be subjected to their horrific written prose (or poetry, in fact, nothing is worse than bad poetry).
To return to the discussion of plagiarism, I doubt that the Notre Dame Anthropologist’s book cited by the Times is accurate; I think it’s a convenient, retroactive rationalization for a problem that I imagine has been present in universities since the dawn of time. Perhaps, and this is just me talking here, perhaps it’s because we’ve become so concerned with plagiarism and are developing tools that make its detection relatively effortless that we are seeing a rise in cases of plagiarism.
If the police increased the presence of traffic cops by 100%, you would probably expect 100% more traffic tickets to be issued. This doesn’t mean that more people are speeding than before, you’re just now able to catch them.

